Dallas Wings vs Chicago Sky Match Player Stats
The dallas wings vs chicago sky match player stats from the July 13, 2026 WNBA matchup tell the story of a highly competitive game that showcased elite individual performances, efficient offense, and smart late-game execution. Dallas secured a 96-91 victory over Chicago at the American Airlines Center, completing a 3-0 season sweep while improving its season record to 16-8. Although the final score favored Dallas, the numbers reveal that both teams had opportunities to control the game, making this contest one of the most balanced meetings of the season.
For fans, analysts, and fantasy basketball followers, player statistics provide much more than scoring totals. They explain how momentum shifted, which players influenced winning possessions, and why Dallas ultimately came away with another victory. Looking closely at shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, turnovers, defensive contributions, and clutch production offers a much deeper understanding than simply reading the final score.
This detailed breakdown explores every major statistical category, evaluates standout individual performances, and explains how each number contributed to the outcome.
Match Overview
| Match Detail | Information |
| Competition | WNBA |
| Date | July 13, 2026 |
| Venue | American Airlines Center, Dallas |
| Attendance | 13,236 |
| Final Score | Dallas Wings 96, Chicago Sky 91 |
| Winning Team | Dallas Wings |
| Season Series | Dallas won 3-0 |
| Broadcast | ESPN, Disney+ |
Dallas entered the contest with a significantly stronger record than Chicago, but nothing about the matchup suggested an easy win. Chicago remained competitive throughout four quarters and even appeared capable of stealing the game entering the final period.
The deciding factor became Dallas’ execution during the closing minutes. Strong ball movement, efficient shooting, and timely defense allowed the Wings to outscore Chicago 30-18 in the fourth quarter and protect home court.
Dallas Wings vs Chicago Sky Match Player Stats: Complete Game Snapshot
Before examining individual performances, it helps to compare how both teams performed across the primary statistical categories.
| Team Statistics | Chicago Sky | Dallas Wings |
| Points | 91 | 96 |
| Field Goals | 36-75 (48%) | 36-75 (48%) |
| Three-Pointers | 7-22 (32%) | 9-25 (36%) |
| Free Throws | 12-13 (92%) | 15-19 (79%) |
| Rebounds | 36 | 33 |
| Assists | 16 | 23 |
| Turnovers | 6 | 5 |
| Steals | 3 | 4 |
| Blocks | 1 | 3 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 6 | 7 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 30 | 26 |
| Personal Fouls | 16 | 13 |
Several statistics immediately stand out.
Both teams finished with identical field-goal efficiency, shooting 48 percent from the floor on exactly 75 attempts. This rarely happens in professional basketball and indicates that neither offense enjoyed a major shooting advantage.
Instead, Dallas gained an edge in several smaller categories that collectively decided the outcome:
- Two additional three-pointers
- Seven more assists
- One fewer turnover
- Better interior defense
- Greater ball movement
- Stronger fourth-quarter execution
Although Chicago collected more rebounds, Dallas converted possessions into quality scoring opportunities more consistently.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
Understanding how the game unfolded requires looking beyond the final score.
| Quarter | Chicago | Dallas |
| First | 20 | 26 |
| Second | 20 | 20 |
| Third | 33 | 20 |
| Fourth | 18 | 30 |
First Quarter
Dallas established an early six-point lead by playing at a faster offensive pace. Paige Bueckers and Arike Ogunbowale attacked the defense aggressively, creating open looks both inside and outside.
Chicago struggled to generate consistent offensive rhythm during the opening minutes.
Second Quarter
Neither team separated itself.
Both clubs scored 20 points, with defenses becoming more physical and limiting transition opportunities.
Chicago gradually settled into the game while Dallas focused on maintaining its advantage rather than extending it.
Third Quarter
Chicago delivered its strongest basketball of the night.
Scoring 33 points in a single quarter demonstrated excellent offensive execution. Sydney Taylor found her shooting rhythm, while Kamilla Cardoso and Azura Stevens controlled the glass.
Momentum briefly shifted toward Chicago as Dallas struggled offensively.
Fourth Quarter
Championship-level teams often distinguish themselves during the final minutes, and Dallas did exactly that.
The Wings erupted for 30 points while holding Chicago to only 18.
Better decision-making, fewer mistakes, and efficient half-court offense completely changed the game’s direction.
The final quarter ultimately determined the winner.
Dallas Wings Starting Lineup Performance
Dallas relied heavily on a balanced starting five.
| Starter | Primary Contribution |
| Jessica Shepard | Rebounding |
| Awak Kuier | Interior defense |
| Arike Ogunbowale | Shot creation |
| Paige Bueckers | Scoring & Playmaking |
| Azzi Fudd | Floor spacing |
Rather than depending on one superstar, Dallas received meaningful production across multiple positions.
That balanced approach made defensive adjustments much more difficult for Chicago.
Paige Bueckers Delivers Another Complete Performance
If one player controlled the flow of the game, it was Paige Bueckers.
Statistics
- 22 points
- 11 assists
- Outstanding offensive leadership
Her double-double reflected far more than scoring ability.
Bueckers consistently recognized defensive rotations and found open teammates in advantageous positions.
Instead of forcing contested shots, she allowed the offense to develop naturally.
Several characteristics defined her performance:
- Excellent court vision
- Smart passing decisions
- Calm leadership
- Efficient shot selection
- Strong transition offense
- High basketball IQ
Her 11 assists directly created numerous scoring opportunities that significantly contributed to Dallas finishing with 23 team assists.
Jessica Shepard Controls the Boards
Rebounding frequently determines possession battles, and Jessica Shepard delivered one of her strongest performances.
Key Numbers
- 10 rebounds
- Reliable interior presence
- Physical post defense
Every defensive rebound prevented Chicago from earning valuable second-chance opportunities.
Shepard also created additional offensive possessions through hustle and positioning rather than relying solely on athleticism.
Her consistency gave Dallas stability whenever Chicago attempted to build momentum.
Arike Ogunbowale’s Offensive Pressure
Although Paige Bueckers finished as Dallas’ leading scorer, Arike Ogunbowale remained central to the offense.
Her aggressive attacking style forced Chicago’s defense to collapse repeatedly.
Even when she wasn’t taking shots, defenders stayed focused on her movement, opening driving lanes for teammates and creating clean perimeter opportunities.
This type of impact often goes unnoticed in traditional box scores but remains invaluable during close games.
Azzi Fudd’s Floor Spacing
Modern basketball values players who stretch defenses.
Azzi Fudd provided exactly that.
Her shooting threat prevented Chicago from packing the paint, giving Dallas greater freedom to attack the basket.
Even possessions without a shot attempt benefited from her spacing because defenders respected her perimeter shooting ability.
Awak Kuier’s Defensive Presence
Defense rarely receives the same attention as scoring, but Awak Kuier played an important role inside.
Her responsibilities included:
- Contesting interior shots
- Protecting the rim
- Rotating quickly on help defense
- Limiting easy baskets
- Supporting defensive rebounding
Those contributions helped Dallas finish with three blocked shots compared to Chicago’s one.
Dallas Bench Contributions
Winning teams typically receive meaningful production from their reserves.
Dallas rotated several experienced players throughout the game:
- Alysha Clark
- Alanna Smith
- Maddy Siegrist
- Li Yueru
- Odyssey Sims
- Sug Sutton
- Aziaha James
The bench maintained offensive rhythm while allowing the starters valuable rest.
One particularly important contribution came from Li Yueru, who collected 10 rebounds. Matching Jessica Shepard’s rebounding total gave Dallas exceptional depth in the frontcourt and prevented Chicago from dominating inside despite finishing with more total rebounds.
Rather than relying exclusively on its starting lineup, Dallas demonstrated the balanced roster depth that has been a defining characteristic throughout the season.
Chicago Sky Starting Lineup Analysis
Despite the loss, Chicago produced several outstanding individual performances.
The starting lineup included:
| Player | Primary Role |
| Azura Stevens | Forward |
| Kamilla Cardoso | Center |
| Courtney Vandersloot | Guard |
| Natasha Cloud | Guard |
| Sydney Taylor | Guard |
Chicago showed resilience throughout the contest, particularly during its explosive third quarter. The team’s interior players controlled the boards effectively, while the guards generated enough offense to keep pressure on Dallas until the final minutes.
The individual performances from several starters deserve closer examination, particularly Sydney Taylor, Azura Stevens, and Kamilla Cardoso, whose statistical contributions kept Chicago within striking distance for most of the game.
Sydney Taylor Leads Chicago’s Scoring Effort
Among all Chicago players, Sydney Taylor delivered the most productive offensive performance. She finished as the team’s leading scorer with 20 points, providing consistent shot-making throughout the contest.
Taylor’s impact became especially noticeable during Chicago’s impressive third quarter. She attacked confidently from the perimeter while also finding opportunities to score inside, preventing Dallas from focusing its defensive attention on a single area of the floor.
Several aspects of her performance stood out:
- Team-high 20 points
- Confident perimeter shooting
- Smart shot selection
- Strong transition scoring
- Consistent offensive pressure
Although Chicago came up short in the final minutes, Taylor’s offensive production ensured the game remained competitive until the closing possessions.
Azura Stevens Dominates the Glass
While scoring often receives the headlines, rebounding played a significant role in Chicago’s game plan.
Azura Stevens collected 13 rebounds, tying for the team lead and giving Chicago a strong presence in the frontcourt.
Her rebounding performance accomplished several important objectives:
- Limited Dallas second-chance opportunities
- Extended Chicago possessions
- Helped control the defensive glass
- Created additional offensive opportunities
Stevens also contributed offensively by remaining active around the basket and forcing Dallas’ interior defenders to stay engaged throughout the game.
Her combination of size, positioning, and timing made her one of Chicago’s most effective players.
Kamilla Cardoso Provides Interior Stability
Kamilla Cardoso matched Azura Stevens with 13 rebounds, creating one of the strongest rebounding partnerships on the court.
Rather than relying only on physical strength, Cardoso demonstrated excellent positioning and anticipation when tracking missed shots.
Her responsibilities included:
- Protecting the paint
- Securing defensive rebounds
- Contesting interior attempts
- Setting effective screens
- Creating space for teammates
The rebounding battle was one area where Chicago held a statistical advantage, and Cardoso’s effort was a major reason why.
Courtney Vandersloot’s Leadership
Veteran leadership often extends beyond measurable statistics.
Courtney Vandersloot helped organize Chicago’s offense by controlling tempo, directing teammates into proper positions, and ensuring possessions remained structured.
Even when Dallas increased defensive pressure late in the game, her experience helped Chicago avoid unnecessary mistakes.
Natasha Cloud’s Two-Way Contribution
Natasha Cloud brought energy on both ends of the floor.
Her defensive intensity helped challenge Dallas’ guards throughout the evening, while her offensive playmaking supported Chicago’s balanced attack.
Players like Cloud often influence games through hustle plays that may not always appear prominently in the final box score.
Chicago Bench Performance
Chicago’s bench featured:
- Maddy Westbeld
- Elizabeth Williams
- Rachel Banham
- Jacy Sheldon
- Gabriela Jaquez
The reserve unit provided valuable minutes and helped maintain competitiveness whenever the starters rested.
Although the bench did not produce the same scoring volume as Dallas’ reserves, it contributed enough to keep the contest close entering the fourth quarter.
Chicago also listed Skylar Diggins, DiJonai Carrington, and Aicha Coulibaly as unavailable due to the coach’s decision.
Team Statistics Explained
Looking beyond individual performances provides a clearer understanding of why Dallas secured the victory.
Shooting Efficiency
One of the most surprising statistics from the game is that both teams shot exactly 48 percent from the field.
Chicago
- 36 made field goals
- 75 attempts
- 48 percent
Dallas
- 36 made field goals
- 75 attempts
- 48 percent
Normally, identical shooting percentages suggest an evenly matched contest, and that was certainly true for much of this game.
However, basketball games are rarely decided by a single statistic.
Three-Point Shooting
Perimeter shooting created one of Dallas’ biggest advantages.
| Team | Three-Pointers |
| Chicago | 7 of 22 (32%) |
| Dallas | 9 of 25 (36%) |
Dallas converted two additional three-pointers.
Those six extra points became especially valuable in a game ultimately decided by only five points.
Modern basketball places tremendous value on efficient perimeter scoring, and Dallas capitalized on those opportunities.
Free Throw Comparison
Chicago actually displayed better free-throw accuracy.
| Team | Free Throws |
| Chicago | 12 of 13 (92%) |
| Dallas | 15 of 19 (79%) |
Although Chicago was significantly more accurate, Dallas reached the line more often.
That resulted in:
Chicago: 12 points
Dallas: 15 points
Those additional free throws helped offset Chicago’s superior percentage.
Rebounding Battle
Rebounding remained one of Chicago’s strongest statistical categories.
| Team | Rebounds |
| Chicago | 36 |
| Dallas | 33 |
Chicago’s frontcourt consistently challenged Dallas inside.
However, the overall rebounding advantage was relatively small and did not translate into enough second-chance scoring opportunities to change the outcome.
Ball Movement Makes the Difference
Perhaps the most meaningful statistical difference appears in the assist totals.
| Team | Assists |
| Chicago | 16 |
| Dallas | 23 |
Seven additional assists demonstrate how effectively Dallas shared the basketball.
Instead of relying on difficult individual shots, the Wings consistently generated quality scoring chances through passing and player movement.
This balanced offensive approach proved especially effective during the fourth quarter.
Turnover Control
Both teams protected the basketball exceptionally well.
| Team | Turnovers |
| Chicago | 6 |
| Dallas | 5 |
Only eleven combined turnovers is an outstanding figure for a fast-paced professional basketball game.
Dallas’ slight edge helped preserve valuable possessions during crucial moments.
Defensive Comparison
Defensive statistics also favored Dallas in several important areas.
| Category | Chicago | Dallas |
| Steals | 3 | 4 |
| Blocks | 1 | 3 |
The Wings produced more defensive stops around the rim while also creating additional transition opportunities through steals.
These numbers may appear small individually, but every extra defensive play matters in a close contest.
Why Dallas Won the Game
The final score reflected several cumulative advantages rather than one dominant factor.
Dallas earned the victory because it:
- Shared the basketball more effectively.
- Made more three-point shots.
- Protected the ball extremely well.
- Executed better during the fourth quarter.
- Received balanced contributions from both starters and reserves.
- Produced timely defensive stops in critical possessions.
Chicago competed admirably and outperformed Dallas in several statistical categories, particularly rebounding and free-throw accuracy.
However, Dallas consistently made the winning plays during the final stretch of the game.
Key Takeaways
Several important lessons emerge from this matchup.
Dallas demonstrated why balanced basketball often beats individual brilliance. Multiple players contributed in meaningful ways, allowing the offense to remain productive regardless of defensive adjustments.
Paige Bueckers’ combination of scoring and playmaking highlighted the importance of a lead guard capable of creating opportunities for teammates while remaining an efficient scorer.
Chicago showed encouraging resilience despite the defeat. Sydney Taylor’s scoring and the rebounding efforts of Azura Stevens and Kamilla Cardoso provided a solid foundation that the team can continue building upon.
Perhaps the most significant takeaway is that games with nearly identical shooting percentages are usually decided by execution in smaller details. Dallas gained slight advantages in assists, turnovers, three-point shooting, and late-game composure, and those margins ultimately proved decisive.
This matchup serves as an excellent example of how efficient teamwork, disciplined decision-making, and balanced contributions can outweigh advantages in individual statistical categories such as rebounding or free-throw percentage.
Complete Player Performance Summary
The following table highlights the most influential individual performances from both teams based on the official game statistics.
| Team | Player | Performance Highlight |
| Dallas Wings | Paige Bueckers | 22 points, 11 assists |
| Dallas Wings | Jessica Shepard | 10 rebounds |
| Dallas Wings | Li Yueru | 10 rebounds |
| Chicago Sky | Sydney Taylor | 20 points |
| Chicago Sky | Azura Stevens | 13 rebounds |
| Chicago Sky | Kamilla Cardoso | 13 rebounds |
These performances shaped the rhythm of the game. Dallas received outstanding production from its backcourt, while Chicago’s frontcourt controlled much of the rebounding battle.
Statistical Comparison of Team Leaders
Breaking down the leading contributors provides a better understanding of where each team excelled.
| Category | Chicago Sky | Dallas Wings |
| Leading Scorer | Sydney Taylor (20) | Paige Bueckers (22) |
| Top Rebounder | Azura Stevens (13) | Jessica Shepard (10) |
| Also Led Rebounding | Kamilla Cardoso (13) | Li Yueru (10) |
| Assist Leader | Team effort | Paige Bueckers (11) |
Dallas possessed the game’s best playmaker, while Chicago controlled more rebounds. That contrast largely defined how both teams approached the contest.
How Dallas Completed the Season Sweep
One of the biggest storylines surrounding this matchup was the season series.
Dallas defeated Chicago in every meeting.
| Date | Result |
| May 21 | Dallas Wings 99, Chicago Sky 89 |
| June 21 | Dallas Wings 93, Chicago Sky 92 |
| July 13 | Dallas Wings 96, Chicago Sky 91 |
Winning three consecutive games against the same opponent requires consistency rather than luck.
Across all three meetings, Dallas repeatedly displayed several strengths:
- Efficient offensive execution
- Balanced scoring
- Better late-game decision-making
- Reliable backcourt leadership
- Strong depth from the bench
Chicago remained competitive in every contest, particularly the final two games, but Dallas consistently made the crucial plays during winning time.
What This Result Means for Both Teams
The victory improved Dallas’ record to 16-8, strengthening its position among the league’s stronger teams.
Chicago fell to 7-16, a disappointing result despite another competitive performance.
For Dallas, this game reinforced several encouraging trends:
- The offense continues to perform efficiently.
- Multiple players can lead on any given night.
- Ball movement remains one of the team’s greatest strengths.
- The roster possesses quality depth.
For Chicago, there were still positives despite the loss.
The rebounding effort was outstanding, the shooting percentage matched Dallas exactly, and the team demonstrated resilience by responding after falling behind early.
The primary area requiring improvement remains late-game execution. Against stronger opponents, closing quarters effectively often determines the outcome.
Expert Analysis
Looking beyond the traditional box score reveals why this game felt closer than the final result suggests.
Both teams attempted exactly 75 field goals.
Both teams made exactly 36 field goals.
Both teams played disciplined basketball with very few turnovers.
Those similarities indicate that neither side dominated statistically.
Instead, Dallas maximized the value of each possession.
The Wings generated more assisted baskets, spaced the floor better, and converted more three-point opportunities.
Those advantages may appear small individually, but together they created the five-point margin.
Another important observation is Dallas’ ability to remain composed after being outscored in the third quarter.
Many teams struggle after losing momentum.
Dallas responded with its strongest quarter of the night, scoring 30 points when the game mattered most.
That response reflects maturity, confidence, and effective coaching.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the July 13, 2026 game between Dallas Wings and Chicago Sky?
Dallas Wings defeated Chicago Sky 96-91 at the American Airlines Center.
Who scored the most points in the game?
Paige Bueckers led all Dallas players with 22 points, while Sydney Taylor paced Chicago with 20 points.
Which players recorded the most rebounds?
Azura Stevens and Kamilla Cardoso each grabbed 13 rebounds for Chicago. Jessica Shepard and Li Yueru led Dallas with 10 rebounds each.
How many assists did Paige Bueckers record?
Paige Bueckers finished with 11 assists, recording an impressive double-double alongside her 22 points.
What was the final season series between Dallas and Chicago?
Dallas Wings completed a 3-0 season sweep, winning all three regular-season meetings.
Which statistic had the biggest impact on the final result?
Although both teams shot 48 percent from the field, Dallas gained advantages in assists, three-point shooting, defensive plays, and fourth-quarter execution, which ultimately proved decisive.
Conclusion
The dallas wings vs chicago sky match player stats reveal a game that was decided by execution rather than overwhelming dominance. Both teams displayed efficient shooting and disciplined ball control, making this one of the more evenly contested matchups of the season.
Dallas ultimately separated itself through superior ball movement, balanced scoring, and outstanding late-game performance. Paige Bueckers delivered an exceptional all-around effort by combining scoring with elite playmaking, while Jessica Shepard and Li Yueru anchored the rebounding effort. Chicago fought hard behind Sydney Taylor’s scoring and the rebounding dominance of Azura Stevens and Kamilla Cardoso, but the Wings’ efficiency in the closing minutes proved to be the difference.
For anyone analyzing this matchup, the numbers demonstrate that success often comes from winning the small battles. Extra assists, timely three-pointers, disciplined defense, and composure under pressure collectively shaped the outcome far more than any single statistic.
