Golden State Valkyries vs Dallas Wings Match Player Stats

The golden state valkyries vs dallas wings match player stats from the June 18, 2026 Commissioner’s Cup matchup tell a story that goes far beyond the final 91-80 score. Golden State overcame a 12-point deficit, turned a nine-point second-quarter disadvantage into a 10-point lead, and controlled the game through rebounding, three-point efficiency, free throws, and timely contributions from several players. Dallas had four players score in double figures, led by Arike Ogunbowale’s 21 points, but Golden State received the game’s biggest individual scoring performance from Gabby Williams, who finished with 25 points. (Dallas Wings)

For readers searching for golden state valkyries vs dallas wings match player stats, the most important takeaway is that this was not simply a game decided by one superstar. The box score shows a matchup in which Dallas actually made one more field goal than Golden State, 30 to 29, yet still lost by 11 points. Golden State’s advantage came from the combination of 41 rebounds to Dallas’ 25, 12 made three-pointers compared with nine, and 21 made free throws compared with 11. Those small differences added up to a decisive result. (Dallas Wings)

Game Overview

The game was played at Chase Center in San Francisco as part of the WNBA Commissioner’s Cup. The announced attendance was 18,064, and the Golden State Valkyries entered the contest with a 9-5 record before improving to 10-5. Dallas fell to 9-6 after the defeat. The official game records identify the contest as Dallas’ visit to Golden State, with the Valkyries eventually winning 91-80. (Dallas Wings)

Category	Dallas Wings	Golden State Valkyries
Final Score	80	91
First Quarter	26	17
Second Quarter	7	27
Third Quarter	29	20
Fourth Quarter	18	27
Field Goals	30-64	29-63
Field Goal Percentage	46.9%	46.0%
Three-Pointers	9-22	12-25
Three-Point Percentage	40.9%	48.0%
Free Throws	11-16	21-27
Rebounds	25	41
Assists	19	20
Turnovers	8	13
Steals	10	4
Blocks	3	3

The table immediately highlights an interesting statistical contrast. Dallas was more careful with the ball and generated more steals, while Golden State dominated the glass and produced more efficient scoring from beyond the arc and the free-throw line. (Dallas Wings)

Golden State Valkyries vs Dallas Wings Match Player Stats

The individual numbers provide an even clearer picture of how the game unfolded. Gabby Williams led all scorers with 25 points, while Kaitlyn Chen added 15 and Janelle Salaün contributed 12. Veronica Burton also reached double figures with 11 points and supplied five assists, giving Golden State a balanced offensive performance.

For Dallas, Arike Ogunbowale paced the team with 21 points. Paige Bueckers scored 15 points and recorded eight assists, Jessica Shepard posted 14 points and 10 rebounds, and rookie Azzi Fudd finished with 10 points and five steals. (Dallas Wings)

Golden State Valkyries Player Leaders

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Steals	Blocks
Gabby Williams	25	3	4	1	0
Kaitlyn Chen	15	2	2	1	0
Janelle Salaün	12	4	1	0	0
Veronica Burton	11	Not listed in supplied data	5	2	Not listed
Kayla Thornton	8	11	Not listed	Not listed	Not listed

Gabby Williams’ 25 points were the headline performance. Her scoring was particularly important because Golden State did not rely on a single high-volume offensive player. Chen, Salaün, and Burton all contributed double-digit scoring, while Thornton’s 11 rebounds gave the Valkyries another major advantage in possession control. (Golden State Valkyries)

Dallas Wings Player Leaders

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Steals
Arike Ogunbowale	21	Not listed in supplied data	Not listed	Not listed
Paige Bueckers	15	Not listed in supplied data	8	Not listed
Jessica Shepard	14	10	Not listed	Not listed
Azzi Fudd	10	Not listed in supplied data	Not listed	5

Arike’s 21 points represented another strong scoring performance in her season, while Shepard’s double-double continued to show her importance on the interior. Bueckers’ eight assists were especially valuable because Dallas needed playmaking to keep the offense moving after Golden State’s second-quarter defensive surge. Fudd’s five steals were a significant defensive contribution and tied a Wings single-game rookie record, according to the team’s official recap. (Dallas Wings)

The Biggest Story: Golden State’s Second Quarter

The second quarter was the turning point of the game.

Dallas entered the period with a 26-17 advantage after scoring effectively in the opening frame. The Wings then pushed their lead to nine points at 30-21. From there, Golden State produced a 19-0 run that completely changed the direction of the contest.

The Valkyries ultimately won the second quarter 27-7. That 20-point swing transformed a game in which Dallas appeared to be in control into one where Golden State entered halftime with momentum and confidence. The Valkyries’ official recap noted that the seven points allowed in the second quarter represented a franchise record for the fewest points conceded in a quarter. (Golden State Valkyries)

This is one of the most important lessons from the golden state valkyries vs dallas wings match player stats. A box score can tell you who scored the most points, but quarter-by-quarter data explains when the game actually changed.

Golden State’s defensive improvement created opportunities at the other end. Once the Valkyries began getting stops, they were able to push the ball and generate easier scoring chances. Kaitlyn Chen and Gabby Williams were central to the 19-0 run, combining for 16 of those 19 points. (Golden State Valkyries)

For Dallas, the second quarter exposed a major weakness in game control. The Wings did not simply lose a close quarter. They were held to seven points while Golden State scored 27.

That kind of swing is difficult to overcome against a team capable of shooting nearly 48% from three-point range.

Gabby Williams Leads Golden State

Gabby Williams was the clear statistical standout.

Her 25 points were the highest total by any player in the game, and she was responsible for more than a quarter of Golden State’s final scoring output. She also added four assists, three rebounds, and one steal.

What makes her performance especially important is the timing of her scoring. The Valkyries needed someone to stabilize the offense after Dallas controlled the opening period. Williams provided that offensive production while Golden State’s defense simultaneously improved.

Her 7-of-16 shooting performance was not simply about volume. She also went 9-of-12 from the free-throw line, helping Golden State create separation in a game where the teams were relatively close in total field goals. The available box score data lists Williams at 25 points, four assists, three rebounds, one steal, seven made field goals, and nine made free throws. (Basketball.com.au)

The broader significance is that Golden State’s offense did not need every player to produce a huge scoring night. Instead, Williams led the way while Chen, Salaün, and Burton provided enough support to prevent Dallas from focusing exclusively on one offensive threat.

Kaitlyn Chen’s Impact Was Bigger Than Her 15 Points

Kaitlyn Chen finished with 15 points, making her the second-leading scorer for Golden State. She shot 7-of-10 from the field and contributed two assists and one steal, according to the available box score. (Basketball.com.au)

Her impact was particularly noticeable during the second-quarter run.

The official Valkyries recap credited Chen and Williams with combining for 16 points during the 19-0 stretch. That makes Chen’s contribution especially meaningful because the run was not built solely around Golden State’s leading scorer.

From a game-analysis perspective, this is where traditional scoring statistics can sometimes miss the full story. A player’s value is not always captured by total points alone. The timing of those points matters. Chen’s scoring arrived during a stretch when Golden State needed to reverse the momentum.

That is one reason this game is useful for understanding player statistics in context. A 15-point performance can be more influential than the raw number suggests when those points arrive during the most decisive stretch of the game.

Janelle Salaün Provides Efficient Support

Janelle Salaün added 12 points and four rebounds. She also made two three-pointers and went 4-of-5 from the free-throw line based on the available box score. (Basketball.com.au)

Her performance helped maintain Golden State’s spacing.

The Valkyries finished 12-of-25 from three-point range, converting 48% of their attempts. Dallas was also efficient from deep at 9-of-22, or 40.9%, but Golden State made three more threes.

Those additional nine points from beyond the arc were significant.

In a game decided by 11 points, a three-made-three difference alone represents a meaningful portion of the final margin. When combined with the free-throw advantage, it becomes even more important.

Salaün’s ability to contribute from outside gave Golden State another player Dallas had to respect defensively.

Veronica Burton’s Playmaking

Veronica Burton finished with 11 points and five assists, making her one of Golden State’s most important facilitators.

The five assists were the highest total listed among Golden State’s players in the supplied game data. Her contribution helped the Valkyries finish with 20 assists, narrowly ahead of Dallas’ 19.

This is an interesting matchup because Dallas actually committed fewer turnovers. The Wings had eight turnovers compared with Golden State’s 13. Dallas also produced 10 steals, compared with four for the Valkyries.

Normally, that type of turnover advantage can help determine a game.

But Golden State compensated by dominating other areas.

The Valkyries were better on the boards, more efficient from three, and more successful at the free-throw line. Their ability to win those categories allowed them to overcome their turnover disadvantage.

Kayla Thornton and the Rebounding Battle

One of the most overlooked parts of the golden state valkyries vs dallas wings match player stats was Kayla Thornton’s rebounding performance.

Thornton finished with 11 rebounds, the highest individual total in the game. Golden State collected 41 rebounds overall, while Dallas finished with only 25.

That is a 16-rebound advantage.

This was arguably the clearest statistical reason Golden State won.

Rebounding creates extra opportunities, ends defensive possessions, and prevents opponents from getting second chances. Even though Dallas made 30 field goals compared with Golden State’s 29, the Valkyries were able to control the total number of possessions through their work on the glass.

The difference also explains why looking only at field-goal totals can be misleading.

Dallas made one more field goal.

Golden State won by 11.

The explanation lies partly in what happened around those shots.

Golden State secured 16 more rebounds, made three more three-pointers, and converted 10 more free throws.

Those extra opportunities and higher-value scoring plays outweighed Dallas’ slight edge in made field goals.

Arike Ogunbowale Remains Dallas’ Leading Scorer

Arike Ogunbowale led Dallas with 21 points.

Her scoring was important because Dallas needed consistent offensive production after Golden State’s second-quarter surge. She was one of four Wings players to reach double figures, showing that the team’s offensive production was not completely dependent on one player. (Dallas Wings)

Still, the Wings needed more from the team as a whole during the decisive middle portion of the game.

The 21 points from Ogunbowale were not enough to compensate for a seven-point second quarter. When a team scores only seven points in a quarter, even an excellent individual scoring performance can become difficult to translate into a win.

For Dallas, the lesson is clear: scoring leaders need support not only in total points but also in maintaining offensive rhythm when the opposing team makes a major defensive adjustment.

Paige Bueckers’ Eight Assists Stand Out

Paige Bueckers scored 15 points and recorded eight assists.

Her eight assists were particularly important because Dallas finished with 19 assists as a team. That means Bueckers accounted for a substantial portion of the team’s playmaking production.

Her performance illustrates why points alone do not fully explain a guard’s influence.

A player can contribute by creating shots for teammates, moving the defense, initiating actions, and making the pass that leads to an open look. Bueckers’ eight assists show that she was heavily involved in creating offense even though her scoring total was below Ogunbowale’s.

However, Dallas still struggled to maintain offensive consistency after the first quarter.

The Wings scored 26 points in the opening period, then just seven in the second. They recovered with 29 points in the third but could not complete the comeback in the fourth.

That sequence suggests the problem was not simply a lack of offensive talent. It was the inability to sustain an effective attack across all four quarters.

Jessica Shepard’s Double-Double

Jessica Shepard recorded 14 points and 10 rebounds.

That gave her a double-double and made her one of Dallas’ most productive interior players. The Wings’ official recap noted that this was her 10th double-double of the season at that point. (Dallas Wings)

Her performance is important when evaluating Dallas’ overall game because the Wings did not completely lose the interior battle in terms of individual production. Shepard was productive.

The larger issue was team rebounding.

One player collecting 10 rebounds is valuable, but Dallas finished 16 rebounds behind Golden State. That gap indicates that the problem extended beyond one individual matchup.

The Wings needed more collective involvement on the glass.

When a team is facing a lineup that aggressively attacks rebounds, guards and wings must contribute as well. Otherwise, the opposing team can repeatedly extend possessions and create additional scoring opportunities.

Azzi Fudd’s Defensive Contribution

Azzi Fudd finished with 10 points and five steals.

The five steals were particularly notable. According to the Dallas Wings’ official recap, Fudd’s five steals tied the franchise’s single-game rookie record. (Dallas Wings)

That is a significant defensive achievement.

Dallas generated 10 steals as a team, more than twice Golden State’s four. Yet the Wings could not convert that defensive activity into enough overall control of the game.

This creates an important analytical distinction.

Defensive statistics such as steals are valuable, but they do not automatically equal defensive success. A team can force turnovers and still lose if it gives up too many rebounds, allows efficient shooting, or struggles to score consistently.

Fudd’s five steals were an individual success.

The team result, however, was determined by a broader collection of factors.

Why Dallas Lost Despite Making More Field Goals

This is perhaps the most interesting statistical question from the game.

Dallas made 30 field goals.

Golden State made 29.

Yet Golden State won 91-80.

The answer is found in three major categories.

1. Three-Point Shooting

Golden State made 12 three-pointers on 25 attempts.

Dallas made nine on 22 attempts.

That gave Golden State a nine-point advantage from made threes.

The Valkyries also shot 48% from beyond the arc, compared with Dallas’ 40.9%.

2. Free-Throw Advantage

Golden State made 21 of 27 free throws.

Dallas made 11 of 16.

That created a 10-point difference in made free throws.

Combined, the three-point and free-throw advantages explain 19 points of scoring difference.

3. Rebounding

Golden State grabbed 41 rebounds.

Dallas collected 25.

The 16-rebound advantage helped Golden State control possessions and create additional opportunities.

These three factors show why field-goal totals alone should never be used as the only measure of offensive performance.

Dallas was effective at making shots.

Golden State was more effective at maximizing the value of its possessions.

The Four-Quarter Game Flow

First Quarter: Dallas Takes Control

Dallas opened the game with 26 points and led Golden State 26-17 after the first quarter.

The Wings’ nine-point advantage suggested that they had established the preferred pace early.

Second Quarter: The Valkyries Flip the Game

The second quarter completely changed the contest.

Dallas scored only seven points, while Golden State scored 27.

The Valkyries’ 19-0 run was the defining sequence of the night.

Third Quarter: Dallas Responds

The Wings came out of halftime with a much better offensive performance, scoring 29 points.

That response was important because it prevented Golden State from turning the game into a runaway victory.

Fourth Quarter: Golden State Finishes

The Valkyries scored 27 points in the final quarter, compared with Dallas’ 18.

Dallas was able to get within two points early in the fourth quarter, but Golden State responded and maintained control. The Wings’ official recap noted that Dallas could get no closer than five during the final eight minutes. (Dallas Wings)

This was a strong closing performance from Golden State.

The Valkyries did not simply build a lead and survive.

They rebuilt their advantage when Dallas threatened.

Team Statistical Comparison

The overall numbers reveal two teams with very different strengths.

Golden State Valkyries

Golden State’s winning formula was built around:

• 41 total rebounds
• 12 made three-pointers
• 48% three-point shooting
• 21 made free throws
• 20 assists
• Four players scoring in double figures
• A 27-7 second quarter
• 27 points in the fourth quarter

The Valkyries also had 13 turnovers, which is an area they would likely want to improve. Their four steals were well below Dallas’ 10.

Dallas Wings

Dallas’ strongest statistical areas included:

• 30 made field goals
• 10 steals
• Only eight turnovers
• 19 assists
• 40.9% three-point shooting
• Four players scoring in double figures
• 29 points in the third quarter

The biggest weaknesses were:

• 25 total rebounds
• Seven points in the second quarter
• 11 made free throws
• Three fewer made three-pointers
• Difficulty closing the game after recovering in the third quarter

The numbers suggest that Dallas did many things well, but Golden State was better in the categories that had the greatest influence on the final margin.

What the Match Says About Both Teams

The game provides useful information about the strengths and weaknesses of both teams.

For Golden State, the most encouraging sign was the team’s ability to respond to adversity. Falling behind early did not lead to panic. Instead, the Valkyries tightened their defense, created transition opportunities, and used multiple scoring options to take control.

Their rebounding performance was also impressive.

A 41-25 advantage is not a minor statistical edge. It represents a fundamental difference in possession control.

For Dallas, the encouraging sign was the ability to score efficiently from the field and generate turnovers. The Wings shot nearly 47% overall and committed only eight turnovers.

The concern was consistency.

Scoring 26 points in the first quarter, seven in the second, 29 in the third, and 18 in the fourth demonstrates how dramatically the offense changed from period to period.

Against a strong opponent, those fluctuations can be costly.

The Most Important Player Stats at a Glance

If a reader wants the shortest possible summary of the golden state valkyries vs dallas wings match player stats, these are the numbers that deserve the most attention:

Golden State Valkyries

• Gabby Williams: 25 points
• Kaitlyn Chen: 15 points
• Janelle Salaün: 12 points
• Veronica Burton: 11 points, five assists
• Kayla Thornton: 11 rebounds

Dallas Wings

• Arike Ogunbowale: 21 points
• Paige Bueckers: 15 points, eight assists
• Jessica Shepard: 14 points, 10 rebounds
• Azzi Fudd: 10 points, five steals

Team-level difference

• Golden State rebounds: 41
• Dallas rebounds: 25
• Golden State three-pointers: 12
• Dallas three-pointers: 9
• Golden State free throws made: 21
• Dallas free throws made: 11
• Golden State turnovers: 13
• Dallas turnovers: 8

These numbers explain the result more effectively than the final score alone.

How to Read Player Stats More Effectively

When evaluating a WNBA matchup, it is tempting to focus on the highest scorer.

That approach can miss the bigger picture.

A better method is to examine five categories together:

Scoring

Points show who produced offensively, but they should be viewed alongside shooting efficiency.

Rebounding

Rebounds help explain possession control. In this matchup, the 16-rebound gap was one of the clearest indicators of Golden State’s superiority.

Playmaking

Assists show how effectively players create opportunities for teammates. Bueckers’ eight assists and Burton’s five were important contributions.

Defensive Activity

Steals and blocks provide useful information, but they should be interpreted alongside the team’s overall defensive performance.

Efficiency

Three-point percentage and free-throw conversion can change the outcome even when teams make a similar number of field goals.

The best analysis combines all five.

Why the Box Score Tells a More Interesting Story Than the Final Score

A 91-80 final score might suggest that Golden State controlled the entire contest.

That was not the case.

Dallas led by nine after the first quarter.

The Wings then experienced a disastrous second quarter.

They responded by scoring 29 points in the third.

They were also within two points early in the fourth.

The final score therefore hides a game that moved through several distinct phases.

This is why player statistics and quarter-by-quarter numbers should be examined together.

Gabby Williams’ 25 points explain who led the scoring.

Kayla Thornton’s 11 rebounds help explain how Golden State controlled possessions.

Chen’s scoring during the second-quarter run explains how the momentum changed.

Bueckers’ eight assists show Dallas still had a strong playmaking presence.

Fudd’s five steals show that Dallas was capable of creating defensive pressure.

Shepard’s double-double demonstrates that Dallas had interior production.

The complete statistical story is much richer than simply saying Golden State won 91-80.

A Deeper Look at the Rebounding Difference

The 41-25 rebounding advantage deserves additional attention because it was the most dramatic team statistical gap.

Golden State collected 16 more rebounds than Dallas.

That difference can influence a game in several ways.

First, defensive rebounds end possessions. When Golden State secured a defensive rebound, Dallas lost the opportunity for a second shot.

Second, offensive rebounds can create extra scoring chances.

Third, strong rebounding allows teams to run in transition and establish better offensive rhythm.

The available game data also shows that both teams scored 32 points in the paint. That means Golden State’s advantage was not simply about dominating inside offensively.

Instead, the rebounding edge helped the Valkyries control the overall possession battle.

That is an important distinction.

A team can have equal points in the paint and still dominate the interior battle through rebounding.

The Role of Three-Point Efficiency

Three-point shooting was another decisive factor.

Golden State made 12 of 25 attempts.

Dallas made nine of 22.

The Valkyries therefore made three additional three-pointers and shot approximately seven percentage points better from distance.

This difference was especially valuable because the teams were nearly identical in total field goals.

If both teams make around 30 field goals, the team that converts more of those attempts from three-point range gains a significant scoring advantage.

Golden State did exactly that.

The Valkyries combined efficient perimeter shooting with strong rebounding and free-throw production.

That combination made it difficult for Dallas to overcome the second-quarter deficit.

The Free-Throw Gap

Golden State made 21 free throws.

Dallas made 11.

That is another 10-point difference.

The Valkyries also attempted 27 free throws compared with Dallas’ 16.

Free throws can be particularly important late in games because they allow a team to score without using the clock in the same way as a normal field-goal possession.

In this contest, Golden State’s ability to reach the line and convert those opportunities helped maintain separation.

It also demonstrates why shooting percentage should not be analyzed in isolation.

Dallas shot slightly better overall from the field, but Golden State scored more efficiently when three-point value and free-throw opportunities were included.

What Dallas Can Learn From the Loss

The Wings’ biggest lesson is consistency.

The team demonstrated that it could score.

It made 30 field goals and shot nearly 47% overall.

The team also protected the ball and forced 10 steals.

The issue was maintaining those strengths when Golden State changed the game.

The seven-point second quarter was the obvious problem.

Dallas also needs a more collective rebounding effort. Shepard’s 10 rebounds were excellent, but the team total of 25 was far below Golden State’s 41.

The Wings cannot rely on one player to solve a team rebounding problem.

The most useful adjustment would be to improve defensive rebounding across the lineup while maintaining the team’s ability to generate turnovers.

What Golden State Can Learn From the Win

Golden State should be pleased with the result, but the 13 turnovers are a reminder that there is room for improvement.

Dallas generated 10 steals, and the Wings had a significant advantage in turnover margin.

Against a team that converts those extra possessions more efficiently, that weakness could become costly.

The Valkyries also benefited from excellent three-point shooting and free-throw efficiency.

The challenge moving forward is maintaining those advantages while reducing unnecessary turnovers.

The most encouraging aspect of the performance was the team’s balance.

Williams led the scoring, but Chen, Salaün, and Burton all reached double figures.

Thornton controlled the glass.

Burton facilitated.

That kind of multi-player contribution can make a team more difficult to defend.

Final Statistical Verdict

The golden state valkyries vs dallas wings match player stats show that Golden State won through a combination of individual production and team-level execution.

Gabby Williams was the leading scorer with 25 points.

Arike Ogunbowale led Dallas with 21.

Paige Bueckers provided eight assists.

Jessica Shepard recorded a double-double.

Azzi Fudd produced five steals.

Kayla Thornton grabbed 11 rebounds.

Kaitlyn Chen played a major role in the decisive second-quarter momentum swing.

Yet the ultimate difference was not one player.

It was Golden State’s 41-25 rebounding advantage, 48% three-point shooting, and 21 made free throws. Those numbers explain how the Valkyries could win despite making one fewer field goal than Dallas.

The game also demonstrated the importance of momentum. Dallas started strongly, but Golden State’s 19-0 second-quarter run changed everything. The Wings fought back in the third quarter, but the Valkyries were able to close the game effectively in the fourth.

From a statistical perspective, this was a victory built on possession control, efficient high-value shooting, and timely scoring.

For Dallas, the performance showed plenty of offensive potential but also highlighted the need for greater consistency and stronger team rebounding.

For Golden State, the result reinforced the value of depth. The Valkyries had multiple players contribute meaningfully, allowing the team to withstand Dallas’ early pressure and finish with an 11-point victory.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the top scorer in the Golden State Valkyries vs Dallas Wings game?

Gabby Williams was the game’s leading scorer with 25 points for the Golden State Valkyries. Arike Ogunbowale led Dallas with 21 points. (Dallas Wings)

What was the final score between the Golden State Valkyries and Dallas Wings?

The Golden State Valkyries defeated the Dallas Wings 91-80 in the Commissioner’s Cup matchup at Chase Center. (NBA.com)

How many rebounds did Kayla Thornton have?

Kayla Thornton recorded 11 rebounds, helping Golden State finish with a 41-25 team rebounding advantage. (Golden State Valkyries)

How many assists did Paige Bueckers record?

Paige Bueckers finished with eight assists and 15 points for the Dallas Wings. (Dallas Wings)

Which Dallas player recorded a double-double?

Jessica Shepard recorded a double-double with 14 points and 10 rebounds. (Dallas Wings)

What was the biggest statistical difference in the game?

The biggest team-level gap was rebounding. Golden State collected 41 rebounds compared with Dallas’ 25. The Valkyries also made more three-pointers and free throws, which helped them win despite making one fewer field goal overall. (NBA.com)

Conclusion

The June 18, 2026 matchup between the Golden State Valkyries and Dallas Wings was a strong example of why basketball analysis should go beyond the final score and leading scorer.

Gabby Williams delivered the game’s top scoring performance with 25 points, while Arike Ogunbowale led Dallas with 21. Paige Bueckers’ eight assists, Jessica Shepard’s 14-point double-double, Azzi Fudd’s five steals, and Kayla Thornton’s 11 rebounds all added important pieces to the statistical story.

The decisive difference came from Golden State’s team execution. The Valkyries dominated the rebounding battle, shot better from three-point range, converted more free throws, and produced a game-changing 19-0 run in the second quarter.

Dallas showed resilience by responding with a 29-point third quarter, but Golden State’s ability to finish strongly secured the 91-80 victory.

The central lesson from the matchup is simple: field-goal totals alone do not determine who wins. Possession control, rebounding, shot value, free-throw production, defensive pressure, and the timing of scoring runs can be equally important.