New Orleans Pelicans vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats
The new orleans pelicans vs washington wizards match player stats provide a detailed look into a high-scoring NBA contest where the New Orleans Pelicans controlled the second half and defeated the Washington Wizards 138-118 on March 9, 2026, at Smoothie King Center. The game highlighted efficient shooting, strong interior scoring, and a major difference in ball security between the two teams.
The Pelicans entered the matchup with a 21-45 record, while the Wizards arrived at 16-47. Despite both teams facing challenging seasons, this game offered valuable insight into player development, offensive execution, and how individual performances can shape a final result.
From reviewing the official box score data and studying the flow of the game, the biggest difference was not only scoring volume but also efficiency. New Orleans converted 53% of its field goals and committed only eight turnovers, allowing its offense to maintain consistent pressure throughout the night.
Washington, meanwhile, showed offensive flashes but struggled to contain New Orleans’ scoring options after halftime. The Wizards scored 65 points in the first half but could not maintain defensive discipline as the Pelicans increased their intensity during the final two quarters.
Match Overview: Pelicans vs Wizards Box Score Breakdown
The matchup took place on March 9, 2026, at Smoothie King Center in New Orleans, Louisiana, with an attendance of 16,698 fans.
The final score was:
New Orleans Pelicans 138, Washington Wizards 118
The result completed a season-series sweep for New Orleans, with the Pelicans winning both meetings between the teams during the season.
The previous matchup occurred on January 10, 2026, when New Orleans defeated Washington 128-107. The second meeting followed a similar pattern, with the Pelicans once again creating separation through offensive efficiency and improved defensive pressure.
Game Information
| Category | Details |
| Sport | NBA Basketball |
| Date | March 9, 2026 |
| Venue | Smoothie King Center |
| Location | New Orleans, LA |
| Attendance | 16,698 |
| Final Score | Pelicans 138, Wizards 118 |
| Winner | New Orleans Pelicans |
| Season Series | Pelicans won 2-0 |
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring Breakdown
The game was competitive early, but New Orleans gradually took control.
| Quarter | Washington Wizards | New Orleans Pelicans |
| First Quarter | 35 | 32 |
| Second Quarter | 30 | 35 |
| Third Quarter | 28 | 35 |
| Fourth Quarter | 25 | 36 |
| Total | 118 | 138 |
Washington started strongly by scoring 35 points in the opening period. Their early offensive rhythm came from aggressive shot creation and strong perimeter activity.
However, New Orleans responded in the second quarter by improving shot selection and attacking Washington’s defense more consistently. The Pelicans entered halftime with momentum and continued that advantage after the break.
The third and fourth quarters were where the game was decided. New Orleans outscored Washington 71-53 in the second half, showing better defensive organization and superior offensive efficiency.
Team Statistical Comparison
The biggest story in the new orleans pelicans vs washington wizards match player stats was the contrast between offensive efficiency and possession control.
New Orleans Pelicans Team Stats
The Pelicans finished with one of their strongest offensive performances of the season.
Key numbers:
- Points: 138
- Field Goals: 47-of-89 (53%)
- Three-Pointers: 7-of-23 (30%)
- Free Throws: 37-of-47 (79%)
- Total Rebounds: 44
- Assists: 25
- Turnovers: 8
- Steals: 11
- Blocks: 6
New Orleans’ 53% shooting from the field was the foundation of the victory. While the team did not rely heavily on three-point shooting, it consistently created high-percentage opportunities inside the arc.
The Pelicans also protected possessions extremely well. Only eight turnovers against a team that needed extra opportunities was a major advantage.
Washington Wizards Team Stats
Washington produced 118 points but struggled defensively.
Key numbers:
- Points: 118
- Field Goals: 41-of-91 (45%)
- Three-Pointers: 14-of-42 (33%)
- Free Throws: 22-of-27 (81%)
- Total Rebounds: 41
- Assists: 27
- Turnovers: 17
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 3
The Wizards actually generated more three-point attempts and made 14 shots from beyond the arc, but their 17 turnovers limited their ability to keep pace.
A team can survive inefficient shooting, but losing possessions against a high-scoring opponent creates a difficult situation. That was the main challenge Washington faced.
Offensive Efficiency Was the Deciding Factor
Looking deeper at the numbers, the matchup was not simply about which team scored more points. Both teams had strong offensive moments.
The difference came from:
- Better field goal percentage from New Orleans
- Fewer turnovers
- More free throw opportunities
- Stronger defensive activity
- More transition chances created from steals
New Orleans attempted 47 free throws compared with Washington’s 27 attempts. That 20-attempt advantage created additional scoring opportunities and helped the Pelicans maintain control.
The Pelicans also recorded 11 steals compared with Washington’s two. Those extra defensive plays helped generate momentum and prevented the Wizards from establishing long offensive possessions.
New Orleans Pelicans Player Performance Analysis
The leading performers were the main reason New Orleans reached 138 points.
Trey Murphy III Leads Pelicans Scoring Attack
Trey Murphy III delivered the top scoring performance for New Orleans with:
- 24 points
Murphy’s impact came from his ability to stretch the defense while remaining aggressive offensively. His scoring helped create space for teammates and prevented Washington from focusing only on interior threats.
A performance like this demonstrates why versatile forwards are valuable in the modern NBA. Players who can score efficiently without dominating the ball create better offensive balance.
Saddiq Bey Provides Complete Contribution
Saddiq Bey recorded one of the most complete performances of the night.
His statistics:
- 23 points
- 10 rebounds
Bey was the team’s leading rebounder and provided strong physical play on both ends of the court.
His double-double showed the importance of consistent effort beyond scoring. Rebounding, defensive positioning, and second-chance opportunities all contributed to New Orleans maintaining control.
Zion Williamson Controls Interior Pressure
Zion Williamson finished with:
- 20 points
Williamson’s ability to attack the basket remained a major factor. His physical presence forced Washington defenders into difficult decisions and helped create free throw opportunities.
When Zion is able to pressure the paint consistently, opposing defenses often collapse, opening opportunities for teammates around him.
Jeremiah Fears Creates Offensive Opportunities
Jeremiah Fears contributed:
- 7 assists
His playmaking helped maintain offensive flow. While scoring receives the most attention in box scores, creating quality possessions is equally important in high-scoring games.
Fears helped New Orleans avoid stagnant possessions and supported the team’s efficient offensive approach.
Washington Wizards Player Performance Analysis
Washington had several productive individual performances despite the loss.
Tre Johnson Leads Washington Scoring
Tre Johnson was Washington’s leading scorer:
- 20 points
Johnson provided offensive aggression and remained one of the Wizards’ most reliable scoring options throughout the game.
His ability to create offense was important because Washington needed multiple scoring sources to compete with New Orleans’ balanced attack.
Trae Young Provides Playmaking
Trae Young finished as Washington’s top playmaker:
- 8 assists
His passing helped Washington create scoring opportunities, especially during the first half when the Wizards built offensive momentum.
However, New Orleans’ defensive adjustments after halftime reduced Washington’s ability to consistently generate efficient possessions.
Julian Reese Controls the Boards
Julian Reese recorded:
- 9 rebounds
Reese’s rebounding effort helped Washington stay competitive on the glass. The Wizards finished with 41 total rebounds, only slightly behind New Orleans’ 44.
The rebounding battle was close, meaning the final result was determined more by shooting efficiency and turnovers than second-chance opportunities.
Advanced Player Breakdown and Tactical Analysis
Continuing the analysis of the new orleans pelicans vs washington wizards match player stats, the second half of the game showed why basketball is often decided by adjustments rather than just talent. Both teams had capable offensive players, but New Orleans executed its game plan more consistently when the pressure increased.
The Pelicans did not win because of one single factor. Their victory came from a combination of efficient scoring, disciplined possessions, defensive activity, and contributions from multiple players.
Washington had moments where its offense looked dangerous, especially early in the game. However, the Wizards struggled to maintain that rhythm when New Orleans increased defensive pressure and forced difficult decisions.
Complete Pelicans Player Impact Analysis
Herbert Jones Provides Defensive Stability
Herbert Jones started for New Orleans and played an important role in balancing the lineup.
Although his biggest contributions are not always reflected in scoring totals, his defensive awareness helped limit Washington’s offensive options.
Jones’ value came from:
- Perimeter defensive pressure
- Strong rotations
- Ability to defend multiple positions
- Creating uncomfortable offensive possessions
In games featuring high-scoring teams, defensive specialists often become the players who change the direction of the matchup. Jones helped New Orleans maintain control when Washington attempted to create momentum.
Dejounte Murray Adds Experience and Control
Dejounte Murray was part of the Pelicans starting group and provided stability in the backcourt.
His role involved:
- Creating offense
- Managing possessions
- Defending opposing guards
- Helping teammates find better scoring opportunities
The Pelicans’ ability to commit only eight turnovers was a reflection of improved decision-making throughout the lineup.
Experienced guards are especially valuable in games where the opponent attempts to increase pace because they help prevent unnecessary mistakes.
Karlo Matkovic and Bench Contributions
New Orleans received important support from its bench unit.
The reserves helped maintain offensive pressure while starters rested. This was one of the less obvious reasons the Pelicans were able to extend their lead.
Strong bench production allows teams to avoid losing momentum during rotation changes.
Jordan Hawkins Provides Perimeter Threat
Jordan Hawkins’ presence gave New Orleans another shooting option.
Even though the Pelicans made only seven three-pointers as a team, having players capable of stretching the floor affected Washington’s defensive positioning.
Opposing defenses cannot easily collapse inside when multiple players are threats from outside.
Derik Queen and Interior Depth
New Orleans also benefited from having additional frontcourt options available.
Interior depth helps with:
- Rebounding
- Physical defense
- Protecting the paint
- Managing foul situations
The Pelicans finished with six blocks, showing their ability to challenge shots around the basket.
Complete Wizards Player Impact Analysis
Alex Sarr Provides Frontcourt Presence
Alex Sarr started for Washington and represented an important part of the Wizards’ future development.
His responsibilities included:
- Protecting the paint
- Rebounding
- Supporting defensive rotations
Against New Orleans’ aggressive interior attack, Washington needed consistent defensive stops. That became more difficult as the game progressed.
Bilal Coulibaly’s Two-Way Role
Bilal Coulibaly started for Washington and contributed as a versatile wing player.
His responsibilities included:
- Defending skilled scorers
- Helping with transition play
- Supporting offensive movement
Young players in developing teams often face difficult assignments against experienced offensive systems, and this matchup provided another learning opportunity.
Leaky Black Supports Defensive Effort
Leaky Black was included in Washington’s starting lineup and brought defensive effort.
Against a Pelicans team shooting 53% from the field, Washington needed stronger resistance across all positions.
Individual defense matters, but team communication becomes even more important against balanced scoring teams.
Statistical Reasons Behind the Final Result
The new orleans pelicans vs washington wizards match player stats reveal several important differences.
1. Shooting Efficiency Advantage
New Orleans:
- 47-of-89 shooting
- 53% field goal percentage
Washington:
- 41-of-91 shooting
- 45% field goal percentage
The Pelicans converted six more field goals while taking two fewer attempts.
This difference created a significant scoring advantage.
Better shot selection allowed New Orleans to score efficiently without depending heavily on outside shooting.
2. Turnover Battle Favored New Orleans
Turnovers:
- Pelicans: 8
- Wizards: 17
This was one of the clearest statistical separators.
Washington gave New Orleans nine additional possessions. Against a team capable of scoring 138 points, those mistakes became extremely costly.
Every possession matters in NBA basketball, and inefficient ball handling can quickly change a competitive game into a double-digit loss.
3. Free Throw Difference
Free throws:
- New Orleans: 37-of-47
- Washington: 22-of-27
The Pelicans created significantly more opportunities at the foul line.
This usually indicates stronger paint attacks, better physical pressure, and more aggressive offensive movement.
4. Defensive Activity
New Orleans defensive statistics:
- 11 steals
- 6 blocks
Washington defensive statistics:
- 2 steals
- 3 blocks
The Pelicans created more disruption.
Their ability to force turnovers and challenge shots prevented Washington from maintaining offensive consistency.
Tactical Breakdown: How New Orleans Won
Aggressive Interior Attack
New Orleans consistently attacked inside rather than relying only on perimeter shooting.
This strategy produced:
- More free throws
- Better scoring efficiency
- Defensive pressure on Washington’s big players
Teams that attack the basket often create multiple advantages because they force defenders to rotate.
Better Ball Movement
The Pelicans finished with 25 assists.
While Washington actually recorded 27 assists, New Orleans’ offensive possessions were more efficient because fewer plays ended in turnovers.
Passing statistics alone do not always tell the full story. The quality of possessions matters more than raw assist numbers.
Second-Half Defensive Adjustments
The game changed after halftime.
Washington scored 65 points in the first half but dropped to:
- 28 points in the third quarter
- 25 points in the fourth quarter
New Orleans improved defensive communication and reduced Washington’s ability to create comfortable scoring opportunities.
Washington Wizards Challenges From the Match
The Wizards showed offensive potential but faced several problems.
Turnover Issues
The 17 turnovers were the biggest concern.
To compete against efficient offensive teams, Washington must improve:
- Passing decisions
- Ball security
- Late-clock execution
Giving away possessions made it difficult to recover defensively.
Defensive Consistency
Allowing 138 points indicates major defensive challenges.
Washington allowed:
- 53% shooting
- 37 free throw makes
- Strong interior scoring
Improving defensive consistency will be essential for future development.
Maintaining Early Momentum
The Wizards scored 35 points in the first quarter and looked competitive.
However, sustaining that level throughout four quarters remains a challenge.
Young teams often struggle with maintaining focus after opponents adjust their strategies.
What the Match Reveals About Both Teams
This game offered more than a final score. It showed where both teams currently stand.
For New Orleans, the victory demonstrated the importance of:
- Balanced scoring
- Efficient offense
- Defensive pressure
- Strong possession management
For Washington, the game highlighted areas requiring improvement:
- Reducing turnovers
- Improving defensive execution
- Maintaining offensive consistency
Official Data Reference
For official box scores, player statistics, and game details, readers can review the NBA’s official statistics database through the NBA Stats platform.
Advanced Insights, Season Context, and Expert Observations
The deeper meaning behind the new orleans pelicans vs washington wizards match player stats comes from understanding how individual performances connected with team strategy. A traditional box score shows points, rebounds, and assists, but experienced basketball analysis requires looking beyond those basic numbers.
This matchup demonstrated how efficiency, decision-making, and defensive execution often determine outcomes more than simple scoring totals. Both teams produced strong offensive stretches, but New Orleans consistently created higher-value possessions and converted those opportunities at a better rate.
From analyzing games like this, one clear pattern appears: teams that control possessions usually control the result. The Pelicans protected the basketball, created additional scoring opportunities through defense, and forced Washington into difficult situations throughout the second half.
Advanced Statistical Insights From the Match
Effective Shooting Created the Biggest Difference
The most important statistical advantage belonged to New Orleans’ shooting efficiency.
The Pelicans finished:
- 47-of-89 from the field
- 53% shooting
The Wizards finished:
- 41-of-91 from the field
- 45% shooting
The difference may appear small, but over nearly 90 attempts, a few percentage points create a significant scoring gap.
New Orleans generated quality attempts by:
- Attacking closeouts
- Creating paint opportunities
- Moving defenders with passing
- Avoiding forced shots
Washington, meanwhile, depended more heavily on difficult attempts, especially when New Orleans increased defensive pressure.
Possession Control Defined the Game
Turnovers were one of the clearest indicators of the final result.
New Orleans:
- 8 turnovers
Washington:
- 17 turnovers
The nine-possession difference gave the Pelicans more chances to score.
In modern NBA analysis, possession efficiency is one of the most valuable indicators because every additional possession creates another opportunity to add points.
The Pelicans did not simply score more because they shot better. They also gave themselves more opportunities to score.
Free Throw Production Showed Offensive Aggression
Free throw statistics highlighted the difference in attacking style.
New Orleans:
- 47 free throw attempts
- 37 made free throws
Washington:
- 27 free throw attempts
- 22 made free throws
The Pelicans consistently pressured the defense and forced Washington into foul situations.
This type of offensive approach is difficult to defend because it creates scoring opportunities even when outside shots are not falling.
Defensive Activity Changed Momentum
Defensive statistics often explain why one team separates itself.
New Orleans recorded:
- 11 steals
- 6 blocks
Washington recorded:
- 2 steals
- 3 blocks
The Pelicans generated more defensive events that changed possession outcomes.
A steal can immediately become a fast-break opportunity, while a block can prevent an opponent from gaining offensive rhythm.
Individual Matchup Analysis
Zion Williamson vs Washington Interior Defense
One of the most important battles involved Zion Williamson’s ability to pressure Washington’s frontcourt defenders.
Williamson finished with:
- 20 points
His scoring impact extended beyond his own points because his drives forced defensive rotations.
When defenses collapse toward a strong interior scorer, other players often receive better opportunities.
This helped create a more balanced New Orleans offensive attack.
Trey Murphy III vs Washington Perimeter Defense
Trey Murphy III was the leading scorer for New Orleans with:
- 24 points
His performance represented the importance of versatile wing scoring.
Players like Murphy create matchup problems because they can contribute without requiring constant isolation possessions.
His scoring allowed the Pelicans to maintain offensive balance.
Saddiq Bey’s All-Around Contribution
Saddiq Bey recorded:
- 23 points
- 10 rebounds
His double-double was one of the most complete performances of the game.
Scoring was important, but his rebounding helped New Orleans finish possessions defensively and create additional opportunities offensively.
A player who contributes in multiple statistical categories often provides more value than someone who only scores.
Tre Johnson’s Role for Washington
Tre Johnson led the Wizards with:
- 20 points
His scoring showed offensive confidence, but Washington needed more consistent contributions across the lineup to match New Orleans’ depth.
Against a team scoring 138 points, relying on a few offensive sources becomes difficult.
Season Series Analysis
The Pelicans completed a 2-0 season-series victory against Washington.
The two meetings were:
January 10, 2026
New Orleans defeated Washington:
- 128-107
March 9, 2026
New Orleans defeated Washington:
- 138-118
Both games showed similar patterns:
- New Orleans produced strong offensive numbers
- Washington struggled defensively
- Pelicans created separation through efficiency
The results suggest a matchup advantage for New Orleans, particularly in controlling tempo and creating high-quality scoring chances.
What This Victory Means for New Orleans
The win improved New Orleans’ confidence during a challenging season.
Although the Pelicans entered the game with a 21-45 record, the performance showed several positive signs:
Offensive Identity
New Orleans demonstrated an ability to score consistently through multiple players.
The team was not dependent on one scorer. Instead, contributions came from:
- Trey Murphy III
- Saddiq Bey
- Zion Williamson
- Supporting players
Balanced scoring makes an offense more difficult to predict.
Improved Decision-Making
Eight turnovers in a high-scoring game was a strong sign of offensive discipline.
Teams often lose control during fast-paced matchups, but New Orleans maintained composure.
Defensive Energy
The Pelicans’ 11 steals and six blocks showed active defensive effort.
Maintaining that level of defensive intensity is important for building consistency.
What This Loss Means for Washington
For Washington, the game provided both concerns and learning opportunities.
Offensive Potential Exists
Scoring 118 points shows the Wizards can create offense.
The team produced:
- 27 assists
- 14 three-pointers
- 81% free throw shooting
Those numbers indicate offensive ability.
Defensive Improvement Is Needed
The major issue was stopping New Orleans.
Allowing:
- 138 points
- 53% shooting
- 37 made free throws
made the comeback challenge much harder.
Defense will likely remain one of the biggest areas of focus moving forward.
Ball Security Must Improve
Seventeen turnovers prevented Washington from maximizing its offensive production.
Reducing mistakes would create more competitive games against high-scoring opponents.
Expert Observations From the Match
A deeper basketball evaluation suggests three major lessons.
1. Efficiency Beats Volume
Washington attempted more field goals:
- Wizards: 91 attempts
- Pelicans: 89 attempts
However, New Orleans made better use of its opportunities.
The quality of attempts mattered more than the quantity.
2. Depth Matters in High-Scoring Games
When both teams score over 100 points, bench contributions become extremely important.
New Orleans maintained offensive pressure even when rotating players.
3. Defense Creates Offense
The Pelicans’ steals and blocks directly contributed to scoring opportunities.
Modern NBA success often depends on teams creating offense through defensive pressure.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What were the key player stats in the New Orleans Pelicans vs Washington Wizards game?
The most notable performances came from Trey Murphy III, who led the Pelicans with 24 points, while Saddiq Bey added 23 points and 10 rebounds. Zion Williamson contributed 20 points, and Jeremiah Fears recorded 7 assists. For Washington, Tre Johnson led the team with 20 points, Trae Young provided 8 assists, and Julian Reese collected 9 rebounds.
Who was the leading scorer in the Pelicans vs Wizards matchup?
Trey Murphy III was the leading scorer for the New Orleans Pelicans with 24 points. He helped the Pelicans maintain offensive efficiency and played a major role in the team’s 138-118 victory.
Why did the Pelicans defeat the Wizards?
The Pelicans won because of better shooting efficiency, stronger defensive activity, and superior ball control. New Orleans shot 53% from the field, committed only eight turnovers, and created more scoring opportunities through steals and free throws.
How many points did the New Orleans Pelicans score against the Washington Wizards?
The New Orleans Pelicans scored 138 points against the Washington Wizards on March 9, 2026. Washington finished with 118 points in the matchup at Smoothie King Center.
Did the Pelicans win the season series against the Wizards?
Yes. The Pelicans won the season series 2-0 against the Wizards. New Orleans also won the previous meeting on January 10, 2026, with a 128-107 victory.
Where can fans find official player statistics for this matchup?
Fans can check official NBA statistics platforms and verified box score sources for complete player numbers, team statistics, and game information.
Conclusion
The new orleans pelicans vs washington wizards match player stats show a game where efficiency, discipline, and defensive pressure separated two high-scoring teams. The final 138-118 result was not decided by scoring ability alone. Both teams produced offensive numbers, but New Orleans consistently created better possessions and converted them at a higher rate.
The Pelicans’ biggest advantages came from shooting efficiency, fewer turnovers, and aggressive offensive execution. Shooting 53% from the field while committing only eight turnovers allowed New Orleans to maintain control throughout the second half.
Trey Murphy III’s 24-point performance led the scoring effort, while Saddiq Bey delivered a complete double-double with 23 points and 10 rebounds. Zion Williamson’s 20 points added another strong interior presence, and Jeremiah Fears helped organize the offense with seven assists.
For Washington, Tre Johnson’s 20 points, Trae Young’s eight assists, and Julian Reese’s nine rebounds showed individual positives despite the loss. However, turnovers and defensive struggles prevented the Wizards from keeping pace with New Orleans’ offensive production.
This matchup also highlighted an important basketball lesson: strong offense becomes much more effective when supported by defensive activity and smart possession management. The Pelicans created extra opportunities, protected the basketball, and used their depth to secure a convincing victory.
For analysts, fans, and basketball followers studying team development, this game provides valuable insight into how individual performances combine with tactical execution to determine outcomes.