76ers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs Boston Celtics match player stats from the 2026 NBA Playoffs Eastern Conference First Round Game 6 provide a detailed look at how Philadelphia secured a crucial victory in a high-pressure elimination game. The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Boston Celtics 106-93 on May 1, 2026, at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, forcing a deciding Game 7 in their tightly contested playoff series.
This matchup was not decided by one single factor. Philadelphia’s balanced scoring, improved defensive execution, superior free-throw efficiency, and stronger second-quarter performance created the separation needed to overcome a Boston team that had finished the regular season with a 56-26 record.
From a basketball analysis perspective, this game is a strong example of how playoff games are often determined by efficiency rather than volume. Boston attempted more three-pointers and collected 46 rebounds, but Philadelphia controlled the areas that directly influenced the final score, including shooting accuracy, ball security, and free-throw conversion.
The 76ers vs Boston Celtics match player stats also highlight the importance of individual leadership. Tyrese Maxey delivered a game-high 30 points, while Paul George added 23 points and Joel Embiid contributed an all-around performance with 19 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists. On Boston’s side, Jaylen Brown led the scoring effort with 18 points, while Jayson Tatum and Neemias Queta each recorded 11 rebounds.
This breakdown examines the complete player performances, team statistics, tactical differences, and the key moments that shaped Philadelphia’s Game 6 win.
Match Overview: Philadelphia 76ers vs Boston Celtics Game 6
The Game 6 meeting between the 76ers and Celtics carried enormous pressure because the series entered the contest tied 3-3. Both teams had already demonstrated their ability to win games against each other, making execution in crucial moments the deciding factor.
Game Information
| Category | Details |
| Event | NBA Playoffs Eastern Conference First Round, Game 6 |
| Match | Philadelphia 76ers vs Boston Celtics |
| Date | May 1, 2026 |
| Venue | Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia, PA |
| Attendance | 19,746 |
| Final Score | Philadelphia 76ers 106, Boston Celtics 93 |
| Winner | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Series Situation Before Game | Tied 3-3 |
| Broadcast | NBCSN, Peacock |
Philadelphia entered the game with a 45-37 regular-season record, including a strong 23-18 home record. Boston arrived with one of the best records in the conference at 56-26, including a 26-15 away record.
Despite Boston’s stronger regular-season performance, playoff basketball often reduces the gap between teams. Every possession becomes more valuable, and small efficiency differences can decide the outcome.
76ers vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats: Team Statistical Comparison
The final box score shows that Philadelphia did not dominate every statistical category. Instead, the 76ers won the areas that had the biggest impact on scoring efficiency.
Team Statistics Comparison
| Statistic | Boston Celtics | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Points | 93 | 106 |
| Field Goals | 36-86 (42%) | 39-89 (44%) |
| Three-Point Shooting | 12-41 (29%) | 11-33 (33%) |
| Free Throws | 9-16 (56%) | 17-19 (89%) |
| Rebounds | 46 | 48 |
| Assists | 18 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 10 |
| Steals | 7 | 7 |
| Blocks | 3 | 6 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 8 | 8 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 38 | 40 |
The most significant difference came at the free-throw line. Philadelphia converted 17 of 19 attempts, shooting 89 percent, while Boston struggled at 9 of 16, finishing at only 56 percent.
In a 13-point playoff game, those additional points created valuable separation. Free throws are often overlooked because they do not create highlight moments, but they represent some of the most efficient scoring opportunities available.
Philadelphia also protected the basketball better. The 76ers committed only 10 turnovers compared with Boston’s 13, giving the Celtics fewer opportunities to generate transition points.
Tyrese Maxey Leads Philadelphia’s Offensive Attack
The biggest individual performance in the game came from Tyrese Maxey. The Philadelphia guard scored 30 points, making him the leading scorer of the contest.
Tyrese Maxey Game Performance
- Points: 30
- Assists: 5
- Steals: 2
Maxey’s scoring output was critical because Boston’s defense focused heavily on limiting Philadelphia’s interior opportunities. His ability to create offense from the perimeter helped the 76ers maintain consistent scoring pressure.
In playoff environments, elite guard play becomes especially valuable because defenses become more physical and structured. Maxey’s ability to create shots allowed Philadelphia to avoid long scoring droughts.
His performance also complemented the contributions of Philadelphia’s veteran players. Instead of relying on one scorer, the 76ers received meaningful production from multiple positions.
Paul George Provides Veteran Playoff Impact
The Paul George delivered one of his most important performances of the series, finishing with 23 points in Game 6.
Paul George Statistics
- Points: 23
- Rebounds: 4
- Assists: 3
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 1
George’s contribution extended beyond scoring. His defensive activity helped Philadelphia create extra possessions, while his ability to make shots prevented Boston from concentrating entirely on Maxey and Embiid.
Experienced playoff players often influence games through decision-making, defensive positioning, and composure under pressure. George’s performance reflected that type of veteran impact.
Joel Embiid’s Complete All-Around Performance
Joel Embiid recorded one of the most complete statistical lines of the game. While his 19 points were not Philadelphia’s highest scoring total, his overall influence was significant.
Joel Embiid Statistics
- Points: 19
- Rebounds: 10
- Assists: 8
Embiid nearly recorded a triple-double, controlling multiple aspects of the game. His 10 rebounds helped Philadelphia compete against Boston’s size, while his 8 assists showed his ability to create opportunities for teammates.
A key part of Embiid’s impact was playmaking. Boston’s defense often collapsed around him, and Philadelphia benefited when he found open teammates instead of forcing difficult shots.
His performance demonstrated why playoff value cannot always be measured only through scoring totals. Rebounding, passing, and defensive attention can influence the game just as much.
Kelly Oubre Jr. and VJ Edgecombe Add Valuable Contributions
Philadelphia received important secondary production from Kelly Oubre Jr. and VJ Edgecombe.
Kelly Oubre Jr. Performance
- Points: 14
- Rebounds: 9
- Steals: 2
- Blocks: 2
Oubre nearly recorded a double-double and provided defensive energy throughout the game. His ability to contribute on both ends helped Philadelphia maintain intensity.
VJ Edgecombe Performance
- Points: 14
- Rebounds: 8
- Assists: 3
- Blocks: 2
Edgecombe added athleticism and defensive versatility. His rebounding contribution from the perimeter helped Philadelphia match Boston’s physical style.
When playoff games become defensive battles, role players who can impact multiple areas often become difference-makers.
Boston Celtics Player Performance Breakdown
Boston entered the game with a strong regular-season record but struggled to generate enough efficient offense against Philadelphia’s defensive pressure.
Jaylen Brown Leads Celtics Scoring
Jaylen Brown finished as Boston’s leading scorer with 18 points.
His scoring total reflected the overall difficulty Boston experienced offensively. The Celtics shot 42 percent from the field and only 29 percent from three-point range.
Jaylen Brown Statistics
- Points: 18
Brown remained aggressive, but Philadelphia’s defensive approach limited Boston’s ability to establish consistent offensive rhythm.
Jayson Tatum and Neemias Queta Control the Boards
Boston’s strongest area was rebounding. Jayson Tatum and Neemias Queta each collected 11 rebounds.
Top Boston Rebounders
Jayson Tatum
- Rebounds: 11
Neemias Queta
- Rebounds: 11
The Celtics won the rebounding battle slightly, but they could not convert that advantage into enough scoring opportunities.
Payton Pritchard’s Playmaking Role
Payton Pritchard recorded a team-high 5 assists for Boston.
His passing helped create opportunities, but Philadelphia’s defensive rotations prevented Boston from consistently converting those chances into points.
Quarter-by-Quarter Analysis: How Philadelphia Built the Winning Margin
The final score of 106-93 does not fully explain how the game developed. The turning point came during the second quarter when Philadelphia created the separation that Boston could not recover from.
The 76ers vs Boston Celtics match player stats show that the biggest statistical advantage came from Philadelphia’s 38-point second quarter. Boston struggled to contain Philadelphia’s offensive movement, allowing the 76ers to establish control before halftime.
First Quarter: Defensive Battle Sets the Tone
The opening quarter reflected the intensity expected from a playoff elimination game.
Quarter Score
| Team | First Quarter Points |
| Boston Celtics | 23 |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 20 |
Both teams played cautiously, focusing on defensive positioning rather than pushing an aggressive pace. Boston held a small three-point advantage after the first period, but neither team was able to create meaningful separation.
Philadelphia struggled early with shot creation, while Boston attempted to establish offensive rhythm through its main scoring options.
The first quarter demonstrated that this would likely be a possession-by-possession contest where execution mattered more than momentum.
Second Quarter: Philadelphia Creates the Decisive Advantage
The second quarter completely changed the direction of the game.
Quarter Score
| Team | Second Quarter Points |
| Boston Celtics | 26 |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 38 |
Philadelphia outscored Boston by 12 points in the second period, creating the largest statistical edge of the game.
This stretch was the foundation of the victory. The 76ers increased their offensive efficiency, moved the ball effectively, and consistently attacked scoring opportunities.
Several factors contributed to Philadelphia’s second-quarter success:
- Better shot selection
- Improved ball movement
- Stronger free-throw generation
- More effective defensive pressure
Boston entered halftime facing a significant challenge because Philadelphia had created a double-digit advantage without needing an unsustainable shooting performance.
Third Quarter: Philadelphia Maintains Control
The third quarter showed Philadelphia’s ability to manage a playoff lead.
Quarter Score
| Team | Third Quarter Points |
| Boston Celtics | 14 |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 24 |
Boston scored only 14 points during the third quarter, which became one of the most damaging stretches of the game.
The Celtics struggled to find consistent offensive answers. Their three-point shooting remained inefficient, and Philadelphia’s defense forced difficult possessions.
The 76ers did not need a spectacular offensive quarter. Instead, they focused on protecting their advantage, controlling tempo, and avoiding unnecessary mistakes.
Fourth Quarter: Boston Attempts a Late Push
The final quarter belonged to Boston statistically, but the comeback opportunity was limited because Philadelphia had already built enough separation.
Quarter Score
| Team | Fourth Quarter Points |
| Boston Celtics | 30 |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 24 |
Boston improved offensively in the fourth quarter, scoring 30 points, but Philadelphia responded well enough to close out the game.
The 76ers maintained their composure, converted important free throws, and avoided the type of mistakes that could allow a playoff opponent to completely change momentum.
Key Statistical Differences That Decided the Game
A deeper look at the numbers reveals several reasons Philadelphia advanced to Game 7 with confidence.
1. Free Throw Efficiency Created a Major Advantage
The largest efficiency difference came from the free-throw line.
Free Throw Comparison
| Team | Made | Attempted | Percentage |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 17 | 19 | 89% |
| Boston Celtics | 9 | 16 | 56% |
Philadelphia gained eight additional points from free throws alone.
In playoff basketball, where scoring margins are usually smaller, free-throw accuracy can determine the outcome. The 76ers consistently converted opportunities while Boston left valuable points at the line.
2. Philadelphia Controlled Ball Security
Turnovers often determine playoff games because every possession carries increased importance.
Turnover Comparison
| Team | Turnovers |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 10 |
| Boston Celtics | 13 |
Philadelphia created three additional possessions by protecting the ball better.
Those extra opportunities helped compensate for Boston’s rebounding advantage and reduced the Celtics’ chances to create transition scoring.
3. Shooting Efficiency Favored Philadelphia
Philadelphia held advantages in overall shooting efficiency.
Field Goal Shooting
- Philadelphia: 39-89 (44%)
- Boston: 36-86 (42%)
Three-Point Shooting
- Philadelphia: 11-33 (33%)
- Boston: 12-41 (29%)
Although Boston made one more three-pointer, Philadelphia was more efficient because it avoided excessive low-percentage attempts.
The Celtics attempted 41 three-pointers but converted only 29 percent. That limited their ability to close the scoring gap.
Defensive Impact: Philadelphia’s Interior Protection
Philadelphia’s defense played an important role in controlling the game.
Defensive Statistics
| Category | Boston Celtics | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Steals | 7 | 7 |
| Blocks | 3 | 6 |
The 76ers recorded six blocks, doubling Boston’s total.
Those defensive plays helped prevent easy scoring opportunities and forced Boston to rely more heavily on difficult perimeter attempts.
Joel Embiid, Kelly Oubre Jr., and VJ Edgecombe each contributed defensive plays that affected Boston’s offensive flow.
How Joel Embiid Changed Philadelphia’s Offensive Structure
One of the most important tactical elements of the game was Embiid’s role as both scorer and facilitator.
Traditional analysis often focuses on points, but Embiid’s eight assists were equally important.
Boston’s defensive strategy required attention toward Embiid whenever he controlled the ball near the basket. Philadelphia used that defensive attention to create open opportunities for teammates.
His impact appeared in three major areas:
Interior Scoring Threat
Embiid forced Boston defenders to respect his ability to score near the basket.
Playmaking Ability
His passing created opportunities when Boston committed additional defenders.
Rebounding Control
His 10 rebounds helped Philadelphia finish defensive possessions.
This balanced approach made Philadelphia’s offense harder to predict.
Boston Celtics Offensive Challenges
Boston’s biggest issue was offensive consistency.
The Celtics had several positive statistical areas, including:
- 46 total rebounds
- 38 defensive rebounds
- 18 assists
However, those advantages did not translate into enough points.
The main problems were:
Three-Point Inefficiency
Boston relied heavily on perimeter shooting but converted only 29 percent.
Free Throw Struggles
A 56 percent free-throw percentage removed valuable scoring opportunities.
Limited Scoring Distribution
Jaylen Brown led the team with 18 points, but Boston needed more production from its primary offensive players.
In playoff elimination games, relying on one or two scoring sources can create problems when defenses increase pressure.
The Bigger Playoff Context
The Game 6 victory kept Philadelphia alive in the Eastern Conference First Round series.
Before this matchup, Boston entered the postseason after finishing the regular season at 56-26, while Philadelphia finished at 45-37.
The standings showed Boston’s regular-season consistency, but playoff basketball often rewards teams that perform best in specific moments.
Philadelphia’s victory demonstrated the importance of:
- Efficient scoring
- Defensive discipline
- Limiting mistakes
- Getting production from multiple players
The series eventually moved to Game 7, where Philadelphia defeated Boston 109-100 on May 3, 2026.
External Reference Placement
For readers who want official NBA statistics and additional game information, one trusted source can be linked on the relevant phrase NBA official statistics:
Suggested placement: Add this link naturally in the introduction or in the section discussing official statistical records.
Individual Player Impact Analysis
The final score showed Philadelphia’s advantage, but the individual performances explain why the 76ers were able to survive a high-pressure playoff environment. The 76ers vs Boston Celtics match player stats reveal a game where multiple Philadelphia players contributed in different ways, while Boston struggled to match that balance.
Playoff success usually requires more than one outstanding scorer. Teams need players who can defend, rebound, create opportunities, and make correct decisions under pressure. Game 6 was a strong example of that principle.
Tyrese Maxey: Philadelphia’s Offensive Engine
Tyrese Maxey was the most important offensive player on the court. His 30-point performance gave Philadelphia a reliable scoring option throughout the game.
Maxey’s Statistical Line
- 30 points
- 5 assists
- 2 steals
Maxey’s ability to create offense was especially valuable because Boston’s defense attempted to slow down Philadelphia’s half-court attack.
His scoring came at important moments, preventing Boston from gaining confidence after defensive stops. In playoff basketball, momentum swings are often created by individual shot-making, and Maxey consistently provided answers.
Beyond scoring, his five assists showed that he was not only looking for his own opportunities. He helped organize Philadelphia’s offense and contributed to the team’s 22 total assists.
Joel Embiid: The Complete Two-Way Presence
Joel Embiid’s performance represented the type of all-around impact that often defines postseason success.
Embiid’s Statistical Line
- 19 points
- 10 rebounds
- 8 assists
Although he was not Philadelphia’s highest scorer, his influence appeared throughout the box score.
His rebounding helped Philadelphia secure defensive possessions, while his passing created opportunities for teammates.
A major part of Embiid’s value came from forcing Boston’s defense to adjust. Even when he was not scoring, his presence affected defensive decisions.
The Celtics had to account for his interior scoring ability, which created more space for players like Maxey and Paul George.
Paul George: Veteran Scoring and Defensive Experience
The Paul George provided a crucial veteran performance during a high-pressure playoff game.
Paul George’s Statistical Line
- 23 points
- 4 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 2 steals
- 1 block
George contributed on both ends of the floor. His scoring helped Philadelphia maintain offensive balance, while his defensive activity created additional challenges for Boston.
Experienced players often become more valuable in playoff situations because they understand when to attack, when to slow the game down, and how to handle defensive pressure.
George’s performance helped Philadelphia avoid becoming too dependent on Maxey.
Kelly Oubre Jr.: Energy and Defensive Versatility
Kelly Oubre Jr. made an important impact beyond his scoring total.
Oubre’s Statistical Line
- 14 points
- 9 rebounds
- 2 steals
- 2 blocks
Oubre was one rebound away from a double-double and provided defensive energy throughout the game.
His ability to contribute rebounds, steals, and blocks gave Philadelphia another player capable of influencing multiple areas.
In close playoff games, these smaller contributions often create the difference between winning and losing.
VJ Edgecombe: Young Player Making a Difference
VJ Edgecombe also delivered a valuable performance.
Edgecombe’s Statistical Line
- 14 points
- 8 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 2 blocks
Edgecombe’s contribution was important because Philadelphia received production outside of its primary stars.
His rebounding and defensive activity helped the 76ers maintain intensity against a physical Boston team.
Young players often face challenges in playoff environments because defensive schemes become more complicated. Edgecombe’s ability to contribute in multiple categories showed composure in a demanding situation.
Boston Celtics Player Evaluation
Boston’s performance included some strong individual efforts, but the team could not generate enough offensive efficiency.
Jaylen Brown: Leading Scorer for Boston
Jaylen Brown finished as Boston’s top scorer.
Brown’s Statistical Line
- 18 points
Brown remained aggressive throughout the contest, but Philadelphia’s defensive approach limited Boston’s overall offensive production.
The Celtics needed additional scoring support to overcome Philadelphia’s second-quarter advantage.
Jayson Tatum and Neemias Queta: Rebounding Strength
Boston’s strongest statistical category was rebounding.
Top Boston Rebounders
Jayson Tatum
- 11 rebounds
Neemias Queta
- 11 rebounds
The Celtics collected 46 total rebounds, slightly fewer than Philadelphia’s 48.
However, winning the rebounding battle did not translate into enough scoring because Boston struggled with shooting efficiency.
Payton Pritchard: Boston’s Main Facilitator
Payton Pritchard led Boston in assists.
Pritchard’s Statistical Contribution
- 5 assists
His playmaking helped create opportunities, but Philadelphia’s defensive execution prevented Boston from developing consistent offensive rhythm.
Major Lessons From the Match
The game provides several important lessons for understanding playoff basketball.
1. Efficiency Matters More Than Volume
Boston attempted 41 three-pointers, but only made 12.
Philadelphia attempted fewer three-pointers but converted at a better rate.
The lesson is clear: taking more shots does not guarantee better offensive results. Shot quality and efficiency remain critical.
2. Role Players Can Decide Elimination Games
Philadelphia’s victory was not created only by Maxey and Embiid.
Players such as Oubre and Edgecombe contributed rebounds, defense, and energy.
Championship-level teams usually depend on contributions from the entire rotation.
3. Free Throws Remain a Hidden Advantage
The difference between 89 percent and 56 percent at the free-throw line was one of the clearest reasons Philadelphia won.
Free throws require concentration and consistency, especially when playoff pressure increases.
4. Turnovers Can Change Possession Battles
Philadelphia committed three fewer turnovers than Boston.
Those extra possessions created additional scoring chances and reduced Boston’s opportunities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the key 76ers vs Boston Celtics match player stats from Game 6?
The most notable performances came from Tyrese Maxey with 30 points, Paul George with 23 points, and Joel Embiid with 19 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists. Jaylen Brown led Boston with 18 points.
Who was the top scorer in the 76ers vs Boston Celtics Game 6 matchup?
Tyrese Maxey was the leading scorer with 30 points for the Philadelphia 76ers.
How did Philadelphia defeat Boston in Game 6?
Philadelphia won 106-93 by combining balanced scoring, strong free-throw shooting, better ball security, and a dominant second quarter where they outscored Boston 38-26.
Which team had the better shooting performance?
Philadelphia had the better overall efficiency, shooting 44 percent from the field and 33 percent from three-point range. Boston shot 42 percent overall and 29 percent from three.
Did Joel Embiid record a triple-double against Boston?
No. Joel Embiid finished close to a triple-double with 19 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists.
What was the biggest statistical difference between the teams?
The biggest difference was free-throw efficiency. Philadelphia shot 89 percent from the line, while Boston shot 56 percent.
Conclusion
The Philadelphia 76ers’ 106-93 victory over the Boston Celtics in Game 6 was built on execution, efficiency, and balanced contributions. The 76ers vs Boston Celtics match player stats show that Philadelphia succeeded because several players impacted the game instead of relying on one individual performance.
Tyrese Maxey provided the scoring leadership with 30 points, while Paul George and Joel Embiid delivered essential support. Embiid’s ability to contribute across scoring, rebounding, and playmaking demonstrated his complete influence on the game.
For Boston, the rebounding numbers and defensive effort were positives, but inefficient shooting and missed free throws created a difficult path to victory.
The most important takeaway from this matchup is that playoff games are often decided by small advantages. Philadelphia won the possession battle through fewer turnovers, converted more free throws, and created separation during the second quarter.
This Game 6 performance became a defining example of how preparation, discipline, and teamwork can overcome regular-season differences when the pressure of the playoffs arrives.
